WallStSmart

Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM)vsNokia Corp ADR (NOK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Nokia Corp ADR generates 190% more annual revenue ($20.00B vs $6.90B). NOK leads profitability with a 4.0% profit margin vs 2.1%. NOK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.07. IRM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

IRM

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.0Value: 2.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.12

NOK

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 5.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.65
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

IRMOvervalued (-10.8%)

Margin of Safety

-10.8%

Fair Value

$90.41

Current Price

$125.99

$35.58 premium

UndervaluedFair: $90.41Overvalued
NOKUndervalued (+16.1%)

Margin of Safety

+16.1%

Fair Value

$8.75

Current Price

$12.91

$4.16 discount

UndervaluedFair: $8.75Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

IRM3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Return on EquityProfitability
225.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 225 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
22.0%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.0%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.6%8/10

16.6% revenue growth

NOK3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$72.07B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
3.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

IRM4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
2.1%3/10

2.1% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.702/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
229.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

NOK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.4%4/10

2.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.654/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

4.0% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : IRM

The strongest argument for IRM centers on Return on Equity, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 16.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : NOK

The strongest argument for NOK centers on Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Price/Book. PEG of 1.07 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : IRM

The primary concerns for IRM are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 229.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : NOK

The primary concerns for NOK are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 80.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

IRM profiles as a growth stock while NOK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

IRM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.15 — expect wider price swings.

IRM is growing revenue faster at 16.6% — sustainability is the question.

NOK generates stronger free cash flow (629M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

IRM scores higher overall (52/100 vs 40/100) and 16.6% revenue growth. NOK offers better value entry with a 16.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Iron Mountain Incorporated

REAL ESTATE · REIT - SPECIALTY · USA

Iron Mountain Inc. (NYSE: IRM) is an American enterprise information management services company founded in 1951 and headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.

Nokia Corp ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Nokia Corporation offers fixed and mobile network solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?