WallStSmart

Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Iron Mountain Incorporated generates 92% more annual revenue ($7.25B vs $3.77B). WAT leads profitability with a 11.9% profit margin vs 3.8%. WAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.60. IRM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

IRM

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 7.0Value: 2.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.10

WAT

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 3.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.85
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

IRMSignificantly Overvalued (-41.5%)

Margin of Safety

-41.5%

Fair Value

$70.83

Current Price

$124.66

$53.83 premium

UndervaluedFair: $70.83Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-84.6%)

Margin of Safety

-84.6%

Fair Value

$178.29

Current Price

$365.36

$187.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $178.29Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

IRM5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Return on EquityProfitability
225.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 225 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
860.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 860.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
-16.2310/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Operating MarginProfitability
21.0%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.0%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
21.6%8/10

Revenue surging 21.6% year-over-year

WAT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
91.4%10/10

Revenue surging 91.4% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.8510/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

IRM4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.8%3/10

3.8% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.702/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
138.3x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.604/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.5x4/10

Trading at 8.5x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
2.9%3/10

ROE of 2.9% — below average capital efficiency

Operating MarginProfitability
2.8%3/10

Operating margin of 2.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : IRM

The strongest argument for IRM centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 21.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 91.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : IRM

The primary concerns for IRM are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 138.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 45.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

IRM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.22 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 91.4% — sustainability is the question.

WAT generates stronger free cash flow (-42M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor REIT - SPECIALTY industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

IRM scores higher overall (64/100 vs 50/100) and 21.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Iron Mountain Incorporated

REAL ESTATE · REIT - SPECIALTY · USA

Iron Mountain Inc. (NYSE: IRM) is an American enterprise information management services company founded in 1951 and headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?