WallStSmart

Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

WPP PLC ADR generates 96% more annual revenue ($13.55B vs $6.90B). IRM leads profitability with a 2.1% profit margin vs -1.6%. IRM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.70. IRM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

IRM

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.0Value: 2.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.12

WPP

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 5.7Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

IRMOvervalued (-10.8%)

Margin of Safety

-10.8%

Fair Value

$90.41

Current Price

$125.99

$35.58 premium

UndervaluedFair: $90.41Overvalued
WPPUndervalued (+75.8%)

Margin of Safety

+75.8%

Fair Value

$75.79

Current Price

$18.09

$57.70 discount

UndervaluedFair: $75.79Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

IRM3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Return on EquityProfitability
225.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 225 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
22.0%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.0%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.6%8/10

16.6% revenue growth

WPP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.71B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

IRM4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
2.1%3/10

2.1% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.702/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
229.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.3%2/10

ROE of -5.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : IRM

The strongest argument for IRM centers on Return on Equity, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 16.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WPP

The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : IRM

The primary concerns for IRM are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 229.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

IRM profiles as a growth stock while WPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

IRM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.15 — expect wider price swings.

IRM is growing revenue faster at 16.6% — sustainability is the question.

WPP generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

IRM scores higher overall (52/100 vs 32/100) and 16.6% revenue growth. WPP offers better value entry with a 75.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Iron Mountain Incorporated

REAL ESTATE · REIT - SPECIALTY · USA

Iron Mountain Inc. (NYSE: IRM) is an American enterprise information management services company founded in 1951 and headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?