WallStSmart

IT Tech Packaging Inc (ITP)vsSuzano Papel e Celulose SA ADR (SUZ)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Suzano Papel e Celulose SA ADR generates 62649% more annual revenue ($49.53B vs $78.94M). SUZ leads profitability with a 23.0% profit margin vs -13.9%. SUZ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

ITP

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 5.27

SUZ

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 7.5Value: 8.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.11
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for ITP.

SUZUndervalued (+50.8%)

Margin of Safety

+50.8%

Fair Value

$22.71

Current Price

$8.18

$14.53 discount

UndervaluedFair: $22.71Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ITP4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1210/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
0.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.2710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

SUZ4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
4.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Return on EquityProfitability
23.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
23.0%9/10

Keeps 23 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

ITP4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.1%4/10

2.1% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$3.04M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-7.2%2/10

ROE of -7.2% — below average capital efficiency

SUZ4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.1%2/10

Revenue declined 5.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-31.9%2/10

Earnings declined 31.9%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-101.68M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.112/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ITP

The strongest argument for ITP centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Debt/Equity. PEG of 0.12 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SUZ

The strongest argument for SUZ centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 23.0% and operating margin at 16.7%.

Bear Case : ITP

The primary concerns for ITP are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Market Cap.

Bear Case : SUZ

The primary concerns for SUZ are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow. Debt-to-equity of 2.03 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ITP profiles as a turnaround stock while SUZ is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

SUZ carries more volatility with a beta of 0.09 — expect wider price swings.

ITP is growing revenue faster at 2.1% — sustainability is the question.

ITP generates stronger free cash flow (1M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SUZ scores higher overall (57/100 vs 43/100), backed by strong 23.0% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

IT Tech Packaging Inc

BASIC MATERIALS · PAPER & PAPER PRODUCTS · China

IT Tech Packaging, Inc. produces and distributes paper products in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Baoding, the People's' Republic of China.

Visit Website →

Suzano Papel e Celulose SA ADR

BASIC MATERIALS · PAPER & PAPER PRODUCTS · USA

Suzano SA produces and sells eucalyptus pulp and paper products in Brazil and internationally. The company is headquartered in Salvador, Brazil.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?