WallStSmart

Jamf Holding (JAMF)vsSonos Inc (SONO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sonos Inc generates 111% more annual revenue ($1.46B vs $690.59M). SONO leads profitability with a 1.6% profit margin vs -0.1%. SONO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D+).

JAMF

Hold

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.5Value: 6.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.29

SONO

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.0Value: 5.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

JAMFUndervalued (+61.1%)

Margin of Safety

+61.1%

Fair Value

$33.55

Current Price

$13.05

$20.50 discount

UndervaluedFair: $33.55Overvalued
SONOUndervalued (+43.7%)

Margin of Safety

+43.7%

Fair Value

$29.31

Current Price

$15.06

$14.25 discount

UndervaluedFair: $29.31Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

JAMF1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SONO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Areas to Watch

JAMF4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.2%4/10

0.2% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$1.75B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

Operating margin of 0.0%

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$1.77B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

1.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
87.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : JAMF

The strongest argument for JAMF centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth.

Bear Case : JAMF

The primary concerns for JAMF are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Market Cap.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 87.6x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

JAMF profiles as a turnaround stock while SONO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.94 — expect wider price swings.

SONO is growing revenue faster at 8.4% — sustainability is the question.

JAMF generates stronger free cash flow (65M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SONO scores higher overall (45/100 vs 35/100). JAMF offers better value entry with a 61.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Jamf Holding

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Jamf Holding Corp. The company is headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Visit Website →

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?