WallStSmart

Korea Electric Power Corp ADR (KEP)vsTransAlta Corp (TAC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Korea Electric Power Corp ADR generates 4412370% more annual revenue ($97.60T vs $2.21B). KEP leads profitability with a 8.9% profit margin vs -7.7%. KEP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.44. KEP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

KEP

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.5Value: 8.3Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.70

TAC

Avoid

33

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.0Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.19

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEP4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4410/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
2.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.21T10/10

Generating 3.2T in free cash flow

TAC0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

KEP3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.7%4/10

0.7% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.702/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
2.621/10

Elevated debt levels

TAC4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
11.3x4/10

Trading at 11.3x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.982/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.1%2/10

ROE of -12.1% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEP

The strongest argument for KEP centers on PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.44 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TAC

TAC has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bear Case : KEP

The primary concerns for KEP are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.62 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TAC

The primary concerns for TAC are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 3.17 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEP profiles as a value stock while TAC is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.78 — expect wider price swings.

KEP is growing revenue faster at 0.7% — sustainability is the question.

KEP generates stronger free cash flow (3.2T), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KEP scores higher overall (66/100 vs 33/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Korea Electric Power Corp ADR

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Korea Electric Power Corporation, an integrated electric utility company, generates, transmits and distributes electricity in South Korea and internationally. The company is headquartered in Naju-si, South Korea.

TransAlta Corp

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

TransAlta Corporation owns, operates and develops a diverse fleet of electric power generation assets in Canada, the United States and Australia. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?