WallStSmart

Korea Electric Power Corp ADR (KEP)vsTransAlta Corp (TAC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Korea Electric Power Corp ADR generates 4305838% more annual revenue ($97.57T vs $2.27B). KEP leads profitability with a 8.0% profit margin vs -1.0%. KEP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.44. KEP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C).

KEP

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 8.3Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.70

TAC

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.05

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEP3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4410/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
2.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TAC1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.3%

Areas to Watch

KEP4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Operating MarginProfitability
4.7%3/10

Operating margin of 4.7%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.1%2/10

Revenue declined 0.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-76.5%2/10

Earnings declined 76.5%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-4.32T2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

TAC4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.982/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.1%2/10

ROE of -12.1% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-71.6%2/10

Earnings declined 71.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEP

The strongest argument for KEP centers on PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.44 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TAC

The strongest argument for TAC centers on Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 12.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : KEP

The primary concerns for KEP are Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.69 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TAC

The primary concerns for TAC are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.38 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEP profiles as a value stock while TAC is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.81 — expect wider price swings.

TAC is growing revenue faster at 12.5% — sustainability is the question.

TAC generates stronger free cash flow (17M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KEP scores higher overall (55/100 vs 43/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Korea Electric Power Corp ADR

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Korea Electric Power Corporation, an integrated electric utility company, generates, transmits and distributes electricity in South Korea and internationally. The company is headquartered in Naju-si, South Korea.

TransAlta Corp

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

TransAlta Corporation owns, operates and develops a diverse fleet of electric power generation assets in Canada, the United States and Australia. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?