WallStSmart

Kinder Morgan Inc (KMI)vsPenske Automotive Group Inc (PAG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Penske Automotive Group Inc generates 81% more annual revenue ($31.72B vs $17.52B). KMI leads profitability with a 18.9% profit margin vs 2.9%. PAG appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.09. KMI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

KMI

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.5Value: 3.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9

PAG

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.5Value: 5.3Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 4/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KMISignificantly Overvalued (-29.1%)

Margin of Safety

-29.1%

Fair Value

$24.36

Current Price

$31.41

$7.05 premium

UndervaluedFair: $24.36Overvalued
PAGFair Value (-1.7%)

Margin of Safety

-1.7%

Fair Value

$170.26

Current Price

$173.81

$3.55 premium

UndervaluedFair: $170.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KMI4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$70.13B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
29.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 29.9%

EPS GrowthGrowth
36.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 36.0% YoY

PAG2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
12.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

KMI1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.872/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

PAG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.094/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
2.9%3/10

2.9% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

Operating margin of 3.7%

Debt/EquityHealth
1.563/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KMI

The strongest argument for KMI centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.9% and operating margin at 29.9%. Revenue growth of 13.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PAG

The strongest argument for PAG centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : KMI

The primary concerns for KMI are PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : PAG

The primary concerns for PAG are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 1.56 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 2.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KMI profiles as a mature stock while PAG is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

PAG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.89 — expect wider price swings.

KMI is growing revenue faster at 13.8% — sustainability is the question.

KMI generates stronger free cash flow (687M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KMI scores higher overall (64/100 vs 51/100), backed by strong 18.9% margins and 13.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kinder Morgan Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Kinder Morgan, Inc. is one of the largest energy infrastructure companies in North America. The company specializes in owning and controlling oil and gas pipelines and terminals.

Penske Automotive Group Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Penske Automotive Group, Inc., a diversified transportation services company, operates commercial and automotive truck dealerships. The company is headquartered in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?