WallStSmart

Kinder Morgan Inc (KMI)vsRush Enterprises A Inc (RUSHA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Kinder Morgan Inc generates 141% more annual revenue ($17.52B vs $7.27B). KMI leads profitability with a 18.9% profit margin vs 3.6%. RUSHA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.16. KMI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

KMI

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.5Value: 3.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9

RUSHA

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.0Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.13
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KMISignificantly Overvalued (-29.1%)

Margin of Safety

-29.1%

Fair Value

$24.36

Current Price

$31.41

$7.05 premium

UndervaluedFair: $24.36Overvalued
RUSHAUndervalued (+55.8%)

Margin of Safety

+55.8%

Fair Value

$164.81

Current Price

$72.31

$92.50 discount

UndervaluedFair: $164.81Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KMI4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$70.13B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
29.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 29.9%

EPS GrowthGrowth
36.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 36.0% YoY

RUSHA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1310/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

KMI1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.872/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

RUSHA4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

Operating margin of 4.9%

PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Revenue declined 9.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KMI

The strongest argument for KMI centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.9% and operating margin at 29.9%. Revenue growth of 13.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : RUSHA

The strongest argument for RUSHA centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : KMI

The primary concerns for KMI are PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : RUSHA

The primary concerns for RUSHA are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, PEG Ratio. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KMI profiles as a mature stock while RUSHA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

RUSHA carries more volatility with a beta of 0.93 — expect wider price swings.

KMI is growing revenue faster at 13.8% — sustainability is the question.

KMI generates stronger free cash flow (687M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KMI scores higher overall (64/100 vs 47/100), backed by strong 18.9% margins and 13.8% revenue growth. RUSHA offers better value entry with a 55.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kinder Morgan Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Kinder Morgan, Inc. is one of the largest energy infrastructure companies in North America. The company specializes in owning and controlling oil and gas pipelines and terminals.

Rush Enterprises A Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?