WallStSmart

Kennametal Inc (KMT)vsOshkosh Corporation (OSK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Oshkosh Corporation generates 388% more annual revenue ($10.43B vs $2.14B). KMT leads profitability with a 6.4% profit margin vs 5.5%. KMT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.25. KMT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

KMT

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.5Value: 4.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.58

OSK

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.0Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.82
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KMTSignificantly Overvalued (-35.3%)

Margin of Safety

-35.3%

Fair Value

$29.75

Current Price

$32.63

$2.88 premium

UndervaluedFair: $29.75Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for OSK.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KMT3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
83.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 83.5% YoY

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
21.8%8/10

Revenue surging 21.8% year-over-year

OSK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.269/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
15.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

KMT3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Profit MarginProfitability
6.4%3/10

6.4% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-20.91M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.2%4/10

0.2% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
5.5%3/10

5.5% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

Operating margin of 3.6%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KMT

The strongest argument for KMT centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 21.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.25 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : KMT

The primary concerns for KMT are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Operating Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KMT profiles as a growth stock while OSK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

KMT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.37 — expect wider price swings.

KMT is growing revenue faster at 21.8% — sustainability is the question.

KMT generates stronger free cash flow (-21M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KMT scores higher overall (72/100 vs 49/100) and 21.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kennametal Inc

INDUSTRIALS · TOOLS & ACCESSORIES · USA

Kennametal Inc. develops and applies tungsten carbides, ceramics and super hard materials and solutions for use in extreme wear and metal cutting applications to enable customers to work against corrosion and high temperature conditions around the world. The company is headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Visit Website →

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?