WallStSmart

Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV ADR (KOF)vsUnilever PLC ADR (UL)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV ADR generates 485% more annual revenue ($296.20B vs $50.62B). UL leads profitability with a 18.3% profit margin vs 8.1%. UL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 10.93. KOF earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

KOF

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.47

UL

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 8.5Value: 4.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.17
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KOFUndervalued (+58.7%)

Margin of Safety

+58.7%

Fair Value

$272.91

Current Price

$114.13

$158.78 discount

UndervaluedFair: $272.91Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for UL.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KOF1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$8.86B8/10

Generating 8.9B in free cash flow

UL4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
70.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 71 in profit

Market CapQuality
$128.57B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.3%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.76B8/10

Generating 1.8B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

KOF4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.7%4/10

4.7% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
18.102/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
139.1x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

UL4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.5%4/10

0.5% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.983/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
10.932/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-5.6%2/10

Earnings declined 5.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KOF

The strongest argument for KOF centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : UL

The strongest argument for UL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.3% and operating margin at 20.3%.

Bear Case : KOF

The primary concerns for KOF are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 139.1x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : UL

The primary concerns for UL are Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 1.98 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KOF carries more volatility with a beta of 0.52 — expect wider price swings.

KOF is growing revenue faster at 4.7% — sustainability is the question.

KOF generates stronger free cash flow (8.9B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor BEVERAGES - NON-ALCOHOLIC industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

KOF scores higher overall (54/100 vs 48/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - NON-ALCOHOLIC · USA

Coca-Cola FEMSA, SAB de CV, a franchise bottler, produces, markets, sells and distributes Coca-Cola brand beverages. The company is headquartered in Mexico City, Mexico.

Visit Website →

Unilever PLC ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Unilever PLC is a fast moving consumer goods company in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Turkey, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, America and Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?