WallStSmart

Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV ADR (KOF)vsUniversal Corporation (UVV)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV ADR generates 9947% more annual revenue ($292.51B vs $2.91B). KOF leads profitability with a 7.9% profit margin vs 2.9%. UVV appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.06. KOF earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

KOF

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 5.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.49

UVV

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KOFUndervalued (+79.7%)

Margin of Safety

+79.7%

Fair Value

$555.46

Current Price

$105.77

$449.69 discount

UndervaluedFair: $555.46Overvalued
UVVUndervalued (+33.3%)

Margin of Safety

+33.3%

Fair Value

$79.29

Current Price

$53.70

$25.59 discount

UndervaluedFair: $79.29Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KOF2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$7.63B8/10

Generating 7.6B in free cash flow

UVV2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

KOF4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.9%3/10

7.9% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
21.492/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

UVV4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$1.34B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
7.0%3/10

ROE of 7.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.9%3/10

2.9% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
3.062/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KOF

The strongest argument for KOF centers on Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : UVV

The strongest argument for UVV centers on Price/Book, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : KOF

The primary concerns for KOF are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : UVV

The primary concerns for UVV are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 2.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

UVV carries more volatility with a beta of 0.59 — expect wider price swings.

KOF is growing revenue faster at 1.1% — sustainability is the question.

KOF generates stronger free cash flow (7.6B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor BEVERAGES - NON-ALCOHOLIC industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

KOF scores higher overall (50/100 vs 45/100). UVV offers better value entry with a 33.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Coca-Cola Femsa SAB de CV ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - NON-ALCOHOLIC · USA

Coca-Cola FEMSA, SAB de CV, a franchise bottler, produces, markets, sells and distributes Coca-Cola brand beverages. The company is headquartered in Mexico City, Mexico.

Visit Website →

Universal Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · TOBACCO · USA

Universal Corporation processes and supplies leaf tobacco and plant ingredients worldwide. The company is headquartered in Richmond, Virginia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?