WallStSmart

Kosmos Energy Ltd (KOS)vsExxon Mobil Corp (XOM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Exxon Mobil Corp generates 25020% more annual revenue ($323.90B vs $1.29B). XOM leads profitability with a 8.9% profit margin vs -54.3%. XOM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

KOS

Avoid

25

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.07

XOM

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 3.44
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KOS.

XOMSignificantly Overvalued (-46.3%)

Margin of Safety

-46.3%

Fair Value

$105.46

Current Price

$154.33

$48.87 premium

UndervaluedFair: $105.46Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KOS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

XOM5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$642.90B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.4410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.279/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.23B8/10

Generating 5.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

KOS4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$1.74B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-80.9%2/10

ROE of -80.9% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-25.8%2/10

Revenue declined 25.8%

XOM3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.3%2/10

Revenue declined 1.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-11.0%2/10

Earnings declined 11.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KOS

The strongest argument for KOS centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : XOM

The strongest argument for XOM centers on Market Cap, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. PEG of 1.38 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : KOS

The primary concerns for KOS are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 3.33 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : XOM

The primary concerns for XOM are Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KOS profiles as a turnaround stock while XOM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

KOS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.66 — expect wider price swings.

XOM is growing revenue faster at -1.3% — sustainability is the question.

XOM generates stronger free cash flow (5.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

XOM scores higher overall (50/100 vs 25/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kosmos Energy Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Kosmos Energy Ltd., an independent deepwater oil and gas exploration and production company, focuses on the Atlantic margins. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Visit Website →

Exxon Mobil Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

Exxon Mobil Corporation, stylized as ExxonMobil, is an American multinational oil and gas corporation headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is the largest direct descendant of John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil, and was formed on November 30, 1999 by the merger of Exxon (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey) and Mobil (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New York). ExxonMobil's primary brands are Exxon, Mobil, Esso, and ExxonMobil Chemical. ExxonMobil is incorporated in New Jersey.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?