WallStSmart

KT Corporation (KT)vsVodafone Group PLC ADR (VOD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

KT Corporation generates 69541% more annual revenue ($28.18T vs $40.46B). KT leads profitability with a 5.5% profit margin vs -1.0%. VOD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.61. VOD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

KT

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.0Value: 5.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.74

VOD

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 4.0Value: 5.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: -0.48
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KT.

VODOvervalued (-13.5%)

Margin of Safety

-13.5%

Fair Value

$13.81

Current Price

$16.19

$2.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $13.81Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KT3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.3x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$93.74B10/10

Generating 93.7B in free cash flow

VOD3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PEG RatioValuation
0.618/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Free Cash FlowQuality
$6.52B8/10

Generating 6.5B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

KT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.744/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
4.8%3/10

ROE of 4.8% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
5.5%3/10

5.5% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
4.302/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

VOD4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.7%3/10

ROE of 5.7% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-15.4%2/10

Earnings declined 15.4%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-0.482/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KT

The strongest argument for KT centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : VOD

The strongest argument for VOD centers on Price/Book, PEG Ratio, Free Cash Flow. PEG of 0.61 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : KT

The primary concerns for KT are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : VOD

The primary concerns for VOD are Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KT profiles as a value stock while VOD is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

VOD carries more volatility with a beta of 0.32 — expect wider price swings.

VOD is growing revenue faster at 7.3% — sustainability is the question.

KT generates stronger free cash flow (93.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

VOD scores higher overall (50/100 vs 46/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

KT Corporation

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · TELECOM SERVICES · USA

KT Corporation provides integrated telecommunications and platform services in Korea and internationally. The company is headquartered in Seongnam, South Korea.

Visit Website →

Vodafone Group PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · TELECOM SERVICES · USA

Vodafone Group Plc is engaged in telecommunications services in Europe and internationally. The company is headquartered in Newbury, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?