WallStSmart

KT Corporation (KT)vsVodafone Group PLC ADR (VOD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

KT Corporation generates 72730% more annual revenue ($28.24T vs $38.78B). KT leads profitability with a 6.1% profit margin vs -11.4%. VOD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.61. KT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

KT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9

VOD

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 3.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: -0.58
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KTUndervalued (+31.6%)

Margin of Safety

+31.6%

Fair Value

$34.20

Current Price

$21.81

$12.39 discount

UndervaluedFair: $34.20Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for VOD.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KT3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
0.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$82.83B10/10

Generating 82.8B in free cash flow

P/E RatioValuation
16.2x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

VOD2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.618/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.05B8/10

Generating 2.0B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

KT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.1%4/10

4.1% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.1%3/10

6.1% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.2%3/10

Operating margin of 3.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

VOD4 concerns · Avg: 1.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
-6.6%2/10

ROE of -6.6% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-15.4%2/10

Earnings declined 15.4%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-0.582/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
-11.4%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KT

The strongest argument for KT centers on Price/Book, Free Cash Flow, P/E Ratio.

Bull Case : VOD

The strongest argument for VOD centers on PEG Ratio, Free Cash Flow. PEG of 0.61 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : KT

The primary concerns for KT are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : VOD

The primary concerns for VOD are Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KT profiles as a value stock while VOD is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

VOD carries more volatility with a beta of 0.34 — expect wider price swings.

VOD is growing revenue faster at 7.3% — sustainability is the question.

KT generates stronger free cash flow (82.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KT scores higher overall (52/100 vs 51/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

KT Corporation

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · TELECOM SERVICES · USA

KT Corporation provides integrated telecommunications and platform services in Korea and internationally. The company is headquartered in Seongnam, South Korea.

Visit Website →

Vodafone Group PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · TELECOM SERVICES · USA

Vodafone Group Plc is engaged in telecommunications services in Europe and internationally. The company is headquartered in Newbury, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?