WallStSmart

Li Auto Inc (LI)vsToyota Motor Corporation ADR (TM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Toyota Motor Corporation ADR generates 49482% more annual revenue ($51.96T vs $104.79B). TM leads profitability with a 8.6% profit margin vs -4.4%. TM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.56. TM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

LI

Avoid

33

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.78

TM

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.5Value: 6.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.64
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LIUndervalued (+76.6%)

Margin of Safety

+76.6%

Fair Value

$82.13

Current Price

$11.81

$70.32 discount

UndervaluedFair: $82.13Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LI1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TM3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$233.41B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

P/E RatioValuation
8.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
86.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 86.9% YoY

Areas to Watch

LI4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.784/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.582/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-7.0%2/10

ROE of -7.0% — below average capital efficiency

TM4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.564/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
16.1x4/10

Trading at 16.1x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.644/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.183/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LI

The strongest argument for LI centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : TM

The strongest argument for TM centers on Market Cap, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 10.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : LI

The primary concerns for LI are Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : TM

The primary concerns for TM are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LI profiles as a turnaround stock while TM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

LI carries more volatility with a beta of 0.54 — expect wider price swings.

TM is growing revenue faster at 10.4% — sustainability is the question.

LI generates stronger free cash flow (-1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TM scores higher overall (65/100 vs 33/100) and 10.4% revenue growth. LI offers better value entry with a 76.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Li Auto Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO MANUFACTURERS · China

Li Auto Inc. designs, develops, manufactures and sells smart electric sport utility vehicles (SUVs) in China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, China.

Toyota Motor Corporation ADR

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO MANUFACTURERS · USA

Toyota Motor Corporation designs, manufactures, assembles and sells passenger cars, minivans and commercial vehicles, and related parts and accessories. The company is headquartered in Toyota, Japan.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?