WallStSmart

Li Auto Inc (LI)vsToyota Motor Corporation ADR (TM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Toyota Motor Corporation ADR generates 46243% more annual revenue ($50.68T vs $109.37B). TM leads profitability with a 7.6% profit margin vs -1.7%. LI appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.83. TM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

LI

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 7.7Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 2/9

TM

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 6.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.63
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LIUndervalued (+78.3%)

Margin of Safety

+78.3%

Fair Value

$88.38

Current Price

$14.20

$74.18 discount

UndervaluedFair: $88.38Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LI3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.838/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

TM4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Market CapQuality
$228.02B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

P/E RatioValuation
9.5x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$398.23B10/10

Generating 398.2B in free cash flow

EPS GrowthGrowth
23.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 23.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

LI4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-2.6%2/10

ROE of -2.6% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.4%2/10

Revenue declined 11.4%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-99.8%2/10

Earnings declined 99.8%

TM4 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.544/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
15.1x4/10

Trading at 15.1x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.9%4/10

1.9% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.634/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LI

The strongest argument for LI centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.83 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TM

The strongest argument for TM centers on Market Cap, P/E Ratio, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : LI

The primary concerns for LI are Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : TM

The primary concerns for TM are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LI profiles as a turnaround stock while TM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

LI carries more volatility with a beta of 0.51 — expect wider price swings.

TM is growing revenue faster at 1.9% — sustainability is the question.

TM generates stronger free cash flow (398.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TM scores higher overall (60/100 vs 41/100). LI offers better value entry with a 78.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Li Auto Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO MANUFACTURERS · China

Li Auto Inc. designs, develops, manufactures and sells smart electric sport utility vehicles (SUVs) in China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, China.

Toyota Motor Corporation ADR

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO MANUFACTURERS · USA

Toyota Motor Corporation designs, manufactures, assembles and sells passenger cars, minivans and commercial vehicles, and related parts and accessories. The company is headquartered in Toyota, Japan.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?