WallStSmart

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)vsEchoStar Corporation (SATS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation generates 401% more annual revenue ($75.11B vs $15.00B). LMT leads profitability with a 6.4% profit margin vs -96.6%. LMT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.09. LMT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

LMT

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.09

SATS

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 7.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -0.08
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LMTSignificantly Overvalued (-37.1%)

Margin of Safety

-37.1%

Fair Value

$458.56

Current Price

$506.51

$47.95 premium

UndervaluedFair: $458.56Overvalued
SATSUndervalued (+66.0%)

Margin of Safety

+66.0%

Fair Value

$323.23

Current Price

$127.15

$196.08 discount

UndervaluedFair: $323.23Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LMT2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
67.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 68 in profit

Market CapQuality
$116.78B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

SATS0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

LMT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Price/BookValuation
15.6x4/10

Trading at 15.6x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.3%4/10

0.3% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.4%3/10

6.4% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

SATS4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-111.3%2/10

ROE of -111.3% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.3%2/10

Revenue declined 4.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-85.6%2/10

Earnings declined 85.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LMT

The strongest argument for LMT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap. PEG of 1.09 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SATS

PEG of 1.34 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : LMT

The primary concerns for LMT are Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 3.23 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : SATS

The primary concerns for SATS are Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 4.40 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LMT profiles as a value stock while SATS is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

SATS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.96 — expect wider price swings.

LMT is growing revenue faster at 0.3% — sustainability is the question.

LMT generates stronger free cash flow (-291M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LMT scores higher overall (55/100 vs 34/100). SATS offers better value entry with a 66.0% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lockheed Martin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Lockheed Martin Corporation is an American aerospace, defense, information security, and technology company with worldwide interests. It is headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, in the Washington, D.C., area.

Visit Website →

EchoStar Corporation

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · TELECOM SERVICES · USA

EchoStar Corporation provides broadband satellite technologies and broadband Internet services. The company is headquartered in Englewood, Colorado.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?