WallStSmart

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)vsSociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B (SQM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation generates 1540% more annual revenue ($75.05B vs $4.58B). SQM leads profitability with a 12.9% profit margin vs 6.7%. SQM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.46. SQM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

LMT

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.5Value: 10.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.09

SQM

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.0Value: 9.3Quality: 7.3
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.01
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LMTUndervalued (+37.5%)

Margin of Safety

+37.5%

Fair Value

$1005.26

Current Price

$624.20

$381.06 discount

UndervaluedFair: $1005.26Overvalued
SQMUndervalued (+22.0%)

Margin of Safety

+22.0%

Fair Value

$96.41

Current Price

$79.16

$17.25 discount

UndervaluedFair: $96.41Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LMT3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
76.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 77 in profit

Market CapQuality
$144.44B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.76B8/10

Generating 2.8B in free cash flow

SQM4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4610/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

EPS GrowthGrowth
52.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 52.3% YoY

Operating MarginProfitability
28.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.3%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

LMT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
29.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
1.6%4/10

1.6% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.7%3/10

6.7% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

SQM1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
37.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LMT

The strongest argument for LMT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. PEG of 1.34 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SQM

The strongest argument for SQM centers on PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.46 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : LMT

The primary concerns for LMT are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 3.23 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : SQM

The primary concerns for SQM are P/E Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LMT profiles as a value stock while SQM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SQM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.04 — expect wider price swings.

SQM is growing revenue faster at 23.3% — sustainability is the question.

LMT generates stronger free cash flow (2.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SQM scores higher overall (66/100 vs 65/100) and 23.3% revenue growth. LMT offers better value entry with a 37.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lockheed Martin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Lockheed Martin Corporation is an American aerospace, defense, information security, and technology company with worldwide interests. It is headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, in the Washington, D.C., area.

Visit Website →

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Sociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals and other products and services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?