WallStSmart

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)vsTwin Disc Incorporated (TWIN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation generates 20559% more annual revenue ($75.11B vs $363.55M). TWIN leads profitability with a 7.3% profit margin vs 6.4%. LMT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.09. TWIN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

LMT

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.09

TWIN

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.42
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LMTSignificantly Overvalued (-53.9%)

Margin of Safety

-53.9%

Fair Value

$340.34

Current Price

$519.10

$178.76 premium

UndervaluedFair: $340.34Overvalued
TWINUndervalued (+32.2%)

Margin of Safety

+32.2%

Fair Value

$25.40

Current Price

$18.66

$6.74 discount

UndervaluedFair: $25.40Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LMT2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
64.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 64 in profit

Market CapQuality
$118.38B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

TWIN4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
2239.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 2239.0% YoY

Revenue GrowthGrowth
19.0%8/10

19.0% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

LMT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Price/BookValuation
15.9x4/10

Trading at 15.9x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.3%4/10

0.3% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.4%3/10

6.4% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

TWIN4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$288.75M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
7.3%3/10

7.3% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LMT

The strongest argument for LMT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap. PEG of 1.09 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TWIN

The strongest argument for TWIN centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 19.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : LMT

The primary concerns for LMT are Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.76 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TWIN

The primary concerns for TWIN are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LMT profiles as a value stock while TWIN is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TWIN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.71 — expect wider price swings.

TWIN is growing revenue faster at 19.0% — sustainability is the question.

TWIN generates stronger free cash flow (2M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TWIN scores higher overall (62/100 vs 55/100) and 19.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lockheed Martin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Lockheed Martin Corporation is an American aerospace, defense, information security, and technology company with worldwide interests. It is headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, in the Washington, D.C., area.

Visit Website →

Twin Disc Incorporated

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Twin Disc, Incorporated designs, manufactures and sells power transmission equipment for off-highway and marine use worldwide. The company is headquartered in Racine, Wisconsin.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?