WallStSmart

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)vsUnilever PLC ADR (UL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation generates 49% more annual revenue ($75.11B vs $50.50B). UL leads profitability with a 18.8% profit margin vs 6.4%. LMT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.09. LMT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

LMT

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.09

UL

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 4.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LMTSignificantly Overvalued (-37.1%)

Margin of Safety

-37.1%

Fair Value

$458.56

Current Price

$506.51

$47.95 premium

UndervaluedFair: $458.56Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for UL.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LMT2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
67.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 68 in profit

Market CapQuality
$116.78B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

UL4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
31.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit

Market CapQuality
$130.20B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.48B8/10

Generating 5.5B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

LMT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Price/BookValuation
15.6x4/10

Trading at 15.6x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.3%4/10

0.3% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.4%3/10

6.4% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

UL3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
10.732/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.4%2/10

Earnings declined 3.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LMT

The strongest argument for LMT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap. PEG of 1.09 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : UL

The strongest argument for UL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.8% and operating margin at 20.1%.

Bear Case : LMT

The primary concerns for LMT are Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 3.23 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : UL

The primary concerns for UL are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LMT profiles as a value stock while UL is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

UL carries more volatility with a beta of 0.45 — expect wider price swings.

LMT is growing revenue faster at 0.3% — sustainability is the question.

UL generates stronger free cash flow (5.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LMT scores higher overall (55/100 vs 46/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lockheed Martin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Lockheed Martin Corporation is an American aerospace, defense, information security, and technology company with worldwide interests. It is headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, in the Washington, D.C., area.

Visit Website →

Unilever PLC ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Unilever PLC is a fast moving consumer goods company in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Turkey, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, America and Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?