WallStSmart

Lowe's Companies Inc (LOW)vsProcter & Gamble Company (PG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Procter & Gamble Company generates 0% more annual revenue ($86.72B vs $86.29B). PG leads profitability with a 19.2% profit margin vs 7.7%. LOW appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.40. PG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

LOW

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 4.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.16

PG

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.01
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LOWSignificantly Overvalued (-37.5%)

Margin of Safety

-37.5%

Fair Value

$167.88

Current Price

$229.20

$61.32 premium

UndervaluedFair: $167.88Overvalued
PGSignificantly Overvalued (-36.0%)

Margin of Safety

-36.0%

Fair Value

$107.43

Current Price

$146.42

$38.99 premium

UndervaluedFair: $107.43Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LOW2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-4.3110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$129.31B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PG5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$340.95B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
31.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.0110/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Operating MarginProfitability
23.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.03B8/10

Generating 3.0B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

LOW4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.404/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.7%3/10

7.7% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-11.0%2/10

Earnings declined 11.0%

PG1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.152/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LOW

The strongest argument for LOW centers on Debt/Equity, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 10.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PG

The strongest argument for PG centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.2% and operating margin at 23.1%.

Bear Case : LOW

The primary concerns for LOW are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : PG

The primary concerns for PG are PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LOW profiles as a value stock while PG is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

LOW carries more volatility with a beta of 0.90 — expect wider price swings.

LOW is growing revenue faster at 10.9% — sustainability is the question.

PG generates stronger free cash flow (3.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PG scores higher overall (61/100 vs 44/100), backed by strong 19.2% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lowe's Companies Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Lowe's Companies, Inc. is an American retail company specializing in home improvement. Headquartered in Mooresville, North Carolina, the company operates a chain of retail stores in the United States and Canada.

Visit Website →

Procter & Gamble Company

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) is an American multinational consumer goods corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, founded in 1837 by William Procter and James Gamble. It specializes in a wide range of personal health, consumer health, personal care, and hygiene products; these products are organized into several segments including Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Fabric & Home Care; and Baby, Feminine, & Family Care. Before the sale of Pringles to Kellogg's, its product portfolio also included food, snacks, and beverages.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?