WallStSmart

Liquidity Services Inc (LQDT)vsSea Ltd (SE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sea Ltd generates 5562% more annual revenue ($27.72B vs $489.62M). LQDT leads profitability with a 6.8% profit margin vs 5.9%. SE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.04. SE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

LQDT

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.5Value: 3.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.66

SE

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.7Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.53
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LQDTSignificantly Overvalued (-30.0%)

Margin of Safety

-30.0%

Fair Value

$24.17

Current Price

$43.04

$18.87 premium

UndervaluedFair: $24.17Overvalued
SEUndervalued (+56.1%)

Margin of Safety

+56.1%

Fair Value

$260.75

Current Price

$108.68

$152.07 discount

UndervaluedFair: $260.75Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LQDT2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0610/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

EPS GrowthGrowth
39.1%8/10

Earnings expanding 39.1% YoY

SE3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
48.1%10/10

Revenue surging 48.1% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$65.07B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.15B8/10

Generating 1.1B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

LQDT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.784/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
39.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Market CapQuality
$1.27B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
6.8%3/10

6.8% margin — thin

SE3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.534/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
5.9%3/10

5.9% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
41.5x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LQDT

The strongest argument for LQDT centers on Debt/Equity, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : SE

The strongest argument for SE centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 48.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.04 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : LQDT

The primary concerns for LQDT are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Market Cap.

Bear Case : SE

The primary concerns for SE are Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 41.5x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LQDT profiles as a value stock while SE is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.52 — expect wider price swings.

SE is growing revenue faster at 48.1% — sustainability is the question.

SE generates stronger free cash flow (1.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LQDT scores higher overall (56/100 vs 56/100). SE offers better value entry with a 56.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Liquidity Services Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Liquidity Services, Inc. offers an e-commerce marketplace that enables buyers and sellers to transact in an automated environment. The company is headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland.

Sea Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Sea Limited is engaged in the digital entertainment, e-commerce and digital financial services businesses in Southeast Asia, Latin America, the rest of Asia and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?