WallStSmart

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)vsTradeweb Markets Inc (TW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lululemon Athletica Inc. generates 441% more annual revenue ($11.10B vs $2.05B). TW leads profitability with a 39.6% profit margin vs 14.2%. LULU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.90. TW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

LULU

Strong Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.32

TW

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 7.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 5.64
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LULUSignificantly Overvalued (-95.2%)

Margin of Safety

-95.2%

Fair Value

$90.10

Current Price

$158.72

$68.62 premium

UndervaluedFair: $90.10Overvalued
TWUndervalued (+34.8%)

Margin of Safety

+34.8%

Fair Value

$176.44

Current Price

$119.95

$56.49 discount

UndervaluedFair: $176.44Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LULU5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
12.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
34.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 34 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.908/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
22.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.3%

TW4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
39.6%10/10

Keeps 40 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
42.4%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 42.4%

EPS GrowthGrowth
128.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 128.8% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.6410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

LULU3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.8%4/10

0.8% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.5%2/10

Earnings declined 18.5%

TW2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
32.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

PEG RatioValuation
2.972/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.90 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TW

The strongest argument for TW centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 39.6% and operating margin at 42.4%. Revenue growth of 12.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : TW

The primary concerns for TW are P/E Ratio, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LULU profiles as a value stock while TW is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

LULU carries more volatility with a beta of 1.01 — expect wider price swings.

TW is growing revenue faster at 12.5% — sustainability is the question.

LULU generates stronger free cash flow (960M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TW scores higher overall (67/100 vs 65/100), backed by strong 39.6% margins and 12.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Tradeweb Markets Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Tradeweb Markets Inc. creates and operates electronic marketplaces in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific and internationally.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?