Mako Mining Corp Common Stock (MAKO)vsSherwin-Williams Co (SHW)
MAKO
Mako Mining Corp Common Stock
$7.60
-3.06%
BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $635.14M
SHW
Sherwin-Williams Co
$351.42
-1.23%
BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $80.35B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Sherwin-Williams Co generates 11810% more annual revenue ($24.91B vs $209.16M). MAKO leads profitability with a 25.1% profit margin vs 10.7%. MAKO trades at a lower P/E of 12.3x. MAKO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).
MAKO
Strong Buy72
out of 100
Grade: B
SHW
Buy56
out of 100
Grade: C
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for MAKO.
Margin of Safety
-7.6%
Fair Value
$337.95
Current Price
$351.42
$13.47 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Strong operational efficiency at 38.4%
Revenue surging 61.7% year-over-year
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Every $100 of equity generates 27 in profit
Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Every $100 of equity generates 67 in profit
Large-cap with strong market position
Areas to Watch
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
0.9% earnings growth
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : MAKO
The strongest argument for MAKO centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Profitability is solid with margins at 25.1% and operating margin at 38.4%. Revenue growth of 61.7% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : SHW
The strongest argument for SHW centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap.
Bear Case : MAKO
The primary concerns for MAKO are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.
Bear Case : SHW
The primary concerns for SHW are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 3.52 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
MAKO profiles as a growth stock while SHW is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
MAKO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.67 — expect wider price swings.
MAKO is growing revenue faster at 61.7% — sustainability is the question.
SHW generates stronger free cash flow (976M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
MAKO scores higher overall (72/100 vs 56/100), backed by strong 25.1% margins and 61.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Mako Mining Corp Common Stock
BASIC MATERIALS · GOLD · USA
Mako Mining Corp is a prominent gold mining company focused on the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties in the Americas, with its flagship San Albino gold project in Nicaragua leading its operations. The company emphasizes sustainable and efficient mining practices, striving to enhance shareholder value amidst favorable market dynamics. With a dedication to innovative operational strategies and growth initiatives, Mako Mining presents an attractive investment opportunity for institutional investors seeking access to the mid-tier gold mining sector.
Sherwin-Williams Co
BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA
Sherwin Williams Company is a Cleveland, Ohio based company in the paint and coating manufacturing industry. The company primarily engages in the manufacture, distribution, and sale of paints, coatings, floorcoverings, and related products to professional, industrial, commercial, and retail customers primarily in North and South America and Europe.
Compare with Other GOLD Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?