WallStSmart

WM Technology Inc (MAPS)vsQuhuo Limited American Depository Shares (QH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Quhuo Limited American Depository Shares generates 1355% more annual revenue ($2.53B vs $173.65M). MAPS leads profitability with a 0.9% profit margin vs -5.9%. MAPS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 36/100 (F).

MAPS

Hold

36

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.5Value: 6.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.37

QH

Avoid

14

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.24
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MAPSUndervalued (+78.0%)

Margin of Safety

+78.0%

Fair Value

$3.11

Current Price

$0.42

$2.69 discount

UndervaluedFair: $3.11Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for QH.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MAPS1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

QH2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$365.78B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Price/BookValuation
0.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

MAPS4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
38.0x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Market CapQuality
$65.75M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
2.5%3/10

ROE of 2.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.9%3/10

0.9% margin — thin

QH4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-42.1%2/10

ROE of -42.1% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-2.3%2/10

Revenue declined 2.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-68.8%2/10

Earnings declined 68.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MAPS

The strongest argument for MAPS centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : QH

The strongest argument for QH centers on Market Cap, Price/Book.

Bear Case : MAPS

The primary concerns for MAPS are P/E Ratio, Market Cap, Return on Equity. Thin 0.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : QH

The primary concerns for QH are Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MAPS profiles as a value stock while QH is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

QH carries more volatility with a beta of 1.07 — expect wider price swings.

QH is growing revenue faster at -2.3% — sustainability is the question.

QH generates stronger free cash flow (1M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MAPS scores higher overall (36/100 vs 14/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

WM Technology Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

WM Technology Inc. (MAPS) stands out as a leading technology provider within the rapidly evolving cannabis industry, offering a comprehensive suite of solutions that includes point-of-sale systems, e-commerce platforms, and compliance management tools. With a strong emphasis on innovation and customer service, the company is dedicated to empowering cannabis businesses to improve operational efficiency and adeptly manage regulatory challenges. As the legal cannabis market experiences significant growth, WM Technology's integrated offerings position it as a crucial partner for clients aiming to succeed and differentiate themselves in an increasingly competitive environment.

Visit Website →

Quhuo Limited American Depository Shares

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · China

Quhuo Limited, operates an operational solutions platform for the workforce in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, the People's Republic of China.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?