WallStSmart

Mativ Holdings Inc. (MATV)vsSociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B (SQM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B generates 167% more annual revenue ($5.30B vs $1.98B). SQM leads profitability with a 15.4% profit margin vs 3.9%. SQM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.34. SQM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).

MATV

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.60

SQM

Strong Buy

74

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 7.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MATVUndervalued (+78.9%)

Margin of Safety

+78.9%

Fair Value

$71.47

Current Price

$7.58

$63.89 discount

UndervaluedFair: $71.47Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SQM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MATV3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
5.3x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
6448.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 6448.0% YoY

SQM4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3410/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
41.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 41.1%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.8%10/10

Revenue surging 69.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
165.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 165.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

MATV4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$410.07M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
3.9%3/10

3.9% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.8%3/10

Operating margin of 1.8%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

SQM1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MATV

The strongest argument for MATV centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : SQM

The strongest argument for SQM centers on PEG Ratio, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.4% and operating margin at 41.1%. Revenue growth of 69.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : MATV

The primary concerns for MATV are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.30 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 3.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : SQM

The primary concerns for SQM are P/E Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MATV profiles as a value stock while SQM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SQM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.97 — expect wider price swings.

SQM is growing revenue faster at 69.8% — sustainability is the question.

SQM generates stronger free cash flow (679M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SQM scores higher overall (74/100 vs 58/100), backed by strong 15.4% margins and 69.8% revenue growth. MATV offers better value entry with a 78.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Mativ Holdings Inc.

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Mativ Holdings, Inc., provides advanced materials and engineering solutions for various industries worldwide. The company is headquartered in Alpharetta, Georgia.

Visit Website →

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Sociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals and other products and services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?