WallStSmart

Minerals Technologies Inc (MTX)vsSociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B (SQM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B generates 121% more annual revenue ($4.58B vs $2.07B). SQM leads profitability with a 12.9% profit margin vs -89.0%. SQM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.46. SQM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

MTX

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0

SQM

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.0Value: 9.3Quality: 7.3
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.01
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MTX.

SQMUndervalued (+22.0%)

Margin of Safety

+22.0%

Fair Value

$96.41

Current Price

$79.16

$17.25 discount

UndervaluedFair: $96.41Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MTX2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
30.0%10/10

Revenue surging 30.0% year-over-year

SQM4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4610/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

EPS GrowthGrowth
52.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 52.3% YoY

Operating MarginProfitability
28.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.3%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

MTX4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.224/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-79.0%2/10

ROE of -79.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-28.8%2/10

Earnings declined 28.8%

Profit MarginProfitability
-89.0%1/10

Currently unprofitable

SQM1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
37.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MTX

The strongest argument for MTX centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 30.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SQM

The strongest argument for SQM centers on PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.46 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : MTX

The primary concerns for MTX are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : SQM

The primary concerns for SQM are P/E Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MTX carries more volatility with a beta of 1.24 — expect wider price swings.

MTX is growing revenue faster at 30.0% — sustainability is the question.

SQM generates stronger free cash flow (317M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SPECIALTY CHEMICALS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

SQM scores higher overall (66/100 vs 43/100) and 23.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Minerals Technologies Inc

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Minerals Technologies Inc. develops, produces and markets a variety of specialty mineral, synthetic mineral and mineral products, and supporting systems and services. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Sociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals and other products and services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?