WallStSmart

Minerals Technologies Inc (MTX)vsSociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B (SQM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B generates 149% more annual revenue ($5.30B vs $2.13B). SQM leads profitability with a 15.4% profit margin vs 7.6%. SQM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.36. SQM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).

MTX

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.47

SQM

Strong Buy

74

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 7.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.05
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MTXUndervalued (+13.3%)

Margin of Safety

+13.3%

Fair Value

$85.54

Current Price

$79.63

$5.91 discount

UndervaluedFair: $85.54Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SQM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MTX2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

P/E RatioValuation
15.5x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

SQM4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3610/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
41.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 41.1%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.8%10/10

Revenue surging 69.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
165.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 165.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

MTX4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.224/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-28.8%2/10

Earnings declined 28.8%

SQM1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.9x4/10

Moderate valuation

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MTX

The strongest argument for MTX centers on Price/Book, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 11.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SQM

The strongest argument for SQM centers on PEG Ratio, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.4% and operating margin at 41.1%. Revenue growth of 69.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : MTX

The primary concerns for MTX are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : SQM

The primary concerns for SQM are P/E Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MTX profiles as a value stock while SQM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

MTX carries more volatility with a beta of 1.14 — expect wider price swings.

SQM is growing revenue faster at 69.8% — sustainability is the question.

SQM generates stronger free cash flow (679M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SQM scores higher overall (74/100 vs 54/100), backed by strong 15.4% margins and 69.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Minerals Technologies Inc

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Minerals Technologies Inc. develops, produces and markets a variety of specialty mineral, synthetic mineral and mineral products, and supporting systems and services. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Sociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals and other products and services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?