WallStSmart

Nasdaq Inc (NDAQ)vsUniversal Health Services Inc (UHS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Universal Health Services Inc generates 228% more annual revenue ($17.76B vs $5.42B). NDAQ leads profitability with a 35.3% profit margin vs 8.6%. UHS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.17. UHS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

NDAQ

Strong Buy

69

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.5Value: 5.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 5/9

UHS

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.0Value: 8.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.97
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for NDAQ.

UHSUndervalued (+40.6%)

Margin of Safety

+40.6%

Fair Value

$389.40

Current Price

$169.96

$219.44 discount

UndervaluedFair: $389.40Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NDAQ4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
35.3%10/10

Keeps 35 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
48.4%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 48.4%

Market CapQuality
$50.28B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

EPS GrowthGrowth
33.8%8/10

Earnings expanding 33.8% YoY

UHS3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.1x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Return on EquityProfitability
21.4%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

Areas to Watch

NDAQ2 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.324/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
26.8x4/10

Moderate valuation

UHS0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NDAQ

The strongest argument for NDAQ centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 35.3% and operating margin at 48.4%. Revenue growth of 13.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : UHS

The strongest argument for UHS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. PEG of 1.17 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : NDAQ

The primary concerns for NDAQ are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : UHS

No major red flags identified for UHS, but monitor valuation.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NDAQ profiles as a mature stock while UHS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

UHS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.13 — expect wider price swings.

NDAQ is growing revenue faster at 13.7% — sustainability is the question.

NDAQ generates stronger free cash flow (629M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UHS scores higher overall (72/100 vs 69/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Nasdaq Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · FINANCIAL DATA & STOCK EXCHANGES · USA

Nasdaq, Inc. is an American multinational financial services corporation that owns and operates stock exchanges in the United States and Europe. It is headquartered in New York City.

Visit Website →

Universal Health Services Inc

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated is an American for-profit multinational managed healthcare and insurance company based in Minnetonka, Minnesota. It offers health care products and insurance services.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?