WallStSmart

Cloudflare Inc (NET)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Waters Corporation generates 46% more annual revenue ($3.17B vs $2.17B). WAT leads profitability with a 20.3% profit margin vs -4.7%. WAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.31. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

NET

Hold

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 4.3Quality: 5.0

WAT

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 9.0Value: 5.7Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

NETOvervalued (-14.8%)

Margin of Safety

-14.8%

Fair Value

$164.92

Current Price

$204.97

$40.05 premium

UndervaluedFair: $164.92Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WAT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NET2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
33.6%10/10

Revenue surging 33.6% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$72.43B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

WAT4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.8%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
29.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
20.3%9/10

Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

NET4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.384/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Price/BookValuation
49.4x2/10

Trading at 49.4x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-8.2%2/10

ROE of -8.2% — below average capital efficiency

WAT2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.1%2/10

Earnings declined 3.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NET

The strongest argument for NET centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 33.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Operating Margin, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.3% and operating margin at 33.8%. PEG of 1.31 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : NET

The primary concerns for NET are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Price/Book.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NET profiles as a hypergrowth stock while WAT is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

NET carries more volatility with a beta of 1.88 — expect wider price swings.

NET is growing revenue faster at 33.6% — sustainability is the question.

NET generates stronger free cash flow (156M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (60/100 vs 35/100), backed by strong 20.3% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cloudflare Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CloudFlare, Inc. operates a cloud platform that offers a range of network services to companies around the world. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?