WallStSmart

Cloudflare Inc (NET)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Waters Corporation generates 62% more annual revenue ($3.77B vs $2.33B). WAT leads profitability with a 11.9% profit margin vs -3.7%. WAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.60. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

NET

Hold

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 3.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.68

WAT

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 3.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.85
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

NETSignificantly Overvalued (-60.1%)

Margin of Safety

-60.1%

Fair Value

$167.77

Current Price

$268.73

$100.96 premium

UndervaluedFair: $167.77Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-84.6%)

Margin of Safety

-84.6%

Fair Value

$178.29

Current Price

$365.36

$187.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $178.29Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NET2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
33.5%10/10

Revenue surging 33.5% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$96.38B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

WAT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
91.4%10/10

Revenue surging 91.4% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.8510/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

NET4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.384/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Price/BookValuation
62.2x2/10

Trading at 62.2x book value

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.604/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.5x4/10

Trading at 8.5x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
2.9%3/10

ROE of 2.9% — below average capital efficiency

Operating MarginProfitability
2.8%3/10

Operating margin of 2.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NET

The strongest argument for NET centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 33.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 91.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : NET

The primary concerns for NET are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.31 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 45.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NET profiles as a hypergrowth stock while WAT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

NET carries more volatility with a beta of 1.67 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 91.4% — sustainability is the question.

NET generates stronger free cash flow (84M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (50/100 vs 35/100) and 91.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cloudflare Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CloudFlare, Inc. operates a cloud platform that offers a range of network services to companies around the world. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?