WallStSmart

Nokia Corp ADR (NOK)vsPACCAR Inc (PCAR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

PACCAR Inc generates 43% more annual revenue ($28.44B vs $19.89B). PCAR leads profitability with a 8.3% profit margin vs 3.3%. NOK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.83. PCAR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 46/100 (D+).

NOK

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 4.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.60

PCAR

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 1/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

NOKSignificantly Overvalued (-734.1%)

Margin of Safety

-734.1%

Fair Value

$0.88

Current Price

$8.41

$7.53 premium

UndervaluedFair: $0.88Overvalued
PCARSignificantly Overvalued (-321.2%)

Margin of Safety

-321.2%

Fair Value

$30.74

Current Price

$116.34

$85.60 premium

UndervaluedFair: $30.74Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NOK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.838/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PCAR1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$60.90B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

NOK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.4%4/10

2.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.604/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.3%3/10

3.3% margin — thin

PCAR4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.6x4/10

Moderate valuation

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-13.7%2/10

Revenue declined 13.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-35.9%2/10

Earnings declined 35.9%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NOK

The strongest argument for NOK centers on Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.83 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : PCAR

The strongest argument for PCAR centers on Market Cap. PEG of 1.11 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : NOK

The primary concerns for NOK are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 63.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : PCAR

The primary concerns for PCAR are P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PCAR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.05 — expect wider price swings.

NOK is growing revenue faster at 2.4% — sustainability is the question.

PCAR generates stronger free cash flow (778M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

NOK scores higher overall (46/100 vs 46/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Nokia Corp ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Nokia Corporation offers fixed and mobile network solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.

Visit Website →

PACCAR Inc

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

PACCAR Inc is an American Fortune 500 company and counts among the largest manufacturers of medium- and heavy-duty trucks in the world. PACCAR is engaged in the design, manufacture and customer support of light-, medium- and heavy-duty trucks under the Kenworth, Peterbilt, Leyland Trucks, and DAF nameplates. PACCAR also designs and manufactures powertrains, provides financial services and information technology, and distributes truck parts related to its principal business.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?