WallStSmart

Nokia Corp ADR (NOK)vsSilicom (SILC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Nokia Corp ADR generates 32017% more annual revenue ($19.89B vs $61.93M). NOK leads profitability with a 3.3% profit margin vs -18.5%. NOK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.83. NOK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 46/100 (D+).

NOK

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 4.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.60

SILC

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

NOKSignificantly Overvalued (-734.1%)

Margin of Safety

-734.1%

Fair Value

$0.88

Current Price

$8.41

$7.53 premium

UndervaluedFair: $0.88Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SILC.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NOK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.838/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SILC2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.7%8/10

16.7% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

NOK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.4%4/10

2.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.604/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.3%3/10

3.3% margin — thin

SILC4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$113.55M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-9.4%2/10

ROE of -9.4% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-79.6%2/10

Earnings declined 79.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-3.35M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NOK

The strongest argument for NOK centers on Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.83 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SILC

The strongest argument for SILC centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 16.7% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.41 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : NOK

The primary concerns for NOK are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 63.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : SILC

The primary concerns for SILC are Market Cap, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NOK profiles as a value stock while SILC is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SILC carries more volatility with a beta of 1.06 — expect wider price swings.

SILC is growing revenue faster at 16.7% — sustainability is the question.

NOK generates stronger free cash flow (225M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

NOK scores higher overall (46/100 vs 43/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Nokia Corp ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Nokia Corporation offers fixed and mobile network solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.

Visit Website →

Silicom

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Silicom Ltd. designs, manufactures, markets and supports network and data infrastructure solutions for a variety of servers, server-based systems, and communications devices in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Kfar Sava, Israel.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?