WallStSmart

Nokia Corp ADR (NOK)vsTotalEnergies SE ADR (TTE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TotalEnergies SE ADR generates 820% more annual revenue ($183.96B vs $20.00B). TTE leads profitability with a 8.2% profit margin vs 4.0%. TTE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.72. TTE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

NOK

Avoid

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 4.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.65

TTE

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.5Value: 7.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.91

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NOK2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$82.73B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.169/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

TTE6 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
57.1%10/10

Earnings expanding 57.1% YoY

Market CapQuality
$195.51B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.728/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
13.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
20.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.3%

Areas to Watch

NOK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.4%4/10

2.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.654/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
3.8%3/10

ROE of 3.8% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

4.0% margin — thin

TTE4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.4%4/10

3.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.914/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.24B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NOK

The strongest argument for NOK centers on Market Cap, Debt/Equity. PEG of 1.42 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TTE

The strongest argument for TTE centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.72 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : NOK

The primary concerns for NOK are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 92.6x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : TTE

The primary concerns for TTE are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NOK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.78 — expect wider price swings.

TTE is growing revenue faster at 3.4% — sustainability is the question.

NOK generates stronger free cash flow (629M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

TTE scores higher overall (72/100 vs 35/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Nokia Corp ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Nokia Corporation offers fixed and mobile network solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.

Visit Website →

TotalEnergies SE ADR

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

TotalEnergies SE is a global integrated oil and gas company. The company is headquartered in Paris, France.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?