WallStSmart

Nokia Corp ADR (NOK)vsEnergous Corporation (WATT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Nokia Corp ADR generates 1006428% more annual revenue ($19.89B vs $1.98M). NOK leads profitability with a 3.3% profit margin vs 0.0%. NOK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 46/100 (D+).

NOK

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 4.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.60

WATT

Avoid

28

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 2.5Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -162.95
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

NOKSignificantly Overvalued (-734.1%)

Margin of Safety

-734.1%

Fair Value

$0.88

Current Price

$8.41

$7.53 premium

UndervaluedFair: $0.88Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WATT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NOK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.838/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

WATT3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.1010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
20.2%8/10

Revenue surging 20.2% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

NOK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.4%4/10

2.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.604/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.3%3/10

3.3% margin — thin

WATT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$12.50M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NOK

The strongest argument for NOK centers on Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.83 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WATT

The strongest argument for WATT centers on Debt/Equity, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 20.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : NOK

The primary concerns for NOK are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 63.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WATT

The primary concerns for WATT are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NOK profiles as a value stock while WATT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

WATT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.69 — expect wider price swings.

WATT is growing revenue faster at 20.2% — sustainability is the question.

NOK generates stronger free cash flow (225M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

NOK scores higher overall (46/100 vs 28/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Nokia Corp ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Nokia Corporation offers fixed and mobile network solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.

Visit Website →

Energous Corporation

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Energous Corporation develops wireless charging solutions. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?