WallStSmart

Natera Inc (NTRA)vsWoodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Woodside Energy Group Ltd generates 463% more annual revenue ($12.98B vs $2.31B). WDS leads profitability with a 20.9% profit margin vs -9.0%. WDS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

NTRA

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9

WDS

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 8.0Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.37
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for NTRA.

WDSUndervalued (+31.5%)

Margin of Safety

+31.5%

Fair Value

$27.39

Current Price

$21.57

$5.82 discount

UndervaluedFair: $27.39Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NTRA1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
39.8%10/10

Revenue surging 39.8% year-over-year

WDS3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
20.9%9/10

Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
15.4x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

NTRA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
15.8x4/10

Trading at 15.8x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Return on EquityProfitability
-14.3%2/10

ROE of -14.3% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
-9.0%1/10

Currently unprofitable

WDS4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.1%2/10

Revenue declined 11.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-14.4%2/10

Earnings declined 14.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NTRA

The strongest argument for NTRA centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 39.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WDS

The strongest argument for WDS centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.9% and operating margin at 19.1%. PEG of 1.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : NTRA

The primary concerns for NTRA are Price/Book, EPS Growth, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : WDS

The primary concerns for WDS are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NTRA profiles as a hypergrowth stock while WDS is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

NTRA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.57 — expect wider price swings.

NTRA is growing revenue faster at 39.8% — sustainability is the question.

WDS generates stronger free cash flow (417M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WDS scores higher overall (53/100 vs 31/100), backed by strong 20.9% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Natera Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Natera, Inc., a diagnostic company, develops and markets molecular testing services globally. The company is headquartered in San Carlos, California.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Woodside Energy Group Ltd is engaged in the exploration, evaluation, development, production, marketing and sale of hydrocarbons in Oceania, Asia, Canada, Africa and internationally. The company is headquartered in Perth, Australia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?