WallStSmart

Nu Holdings Ltd (NU)vsU.S. Bancorp (USB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

U.S. Bancorp generates 260% more annual revenue ($27.32B vs $7.59B). NU leads profitability with a 41.9% profit margin vs 29.9%. NU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.86. NU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 79/100 (B+).

NU

Strong Buy

79

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 10.0Profit: 9.0Value: 6.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.22

USB

Strong Buy

75

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 5.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -0.36

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NU6 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
Profit MarginProfitability
41.9%10/10

Keeps 42 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
48.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 48.2%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.7%10/10

Revenue surging 43.7% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
55.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 55.9% YoY

Market CapQuality
$70.91B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit

USB6 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Operating MarginProfitability
39.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 39.7%

Market CapQuality
$100.43B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Profit MarginProfitability
29.9%9/10

Keeps 30 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
12.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
21.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 21.6% YoY

Areas to Watch

NU3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.29B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.222/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

USB3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.134/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Debt/EquityHealth
1.423/10

Elevated debt levels

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-0.362/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NU

The strongest argument for NU centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 41.9% and operating margin at 48.2%. Revenue growth of 43.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : USB

The strongest argument for USB centers on Operating Margin, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 29.9% and operating margin at 39.7%. Revenue growth of 10.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : NU

The primary concerns for NU are Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : USB

The primary concerns for USB are PEG Ratio, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NU profiles as a growth stock while USB is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

USB carries more volatility with a beta of 0.98 — expect wider price swings.

NU is growing revenue faster at 43.7% — sustainability is the question.

USB generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

NU scores higher overall (79/100 vs 75/100), backed by strong 41.9% margins and 43.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Nu Holdings Ltd

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - REGIONAL · USA

Nu Holdings Ltd. operates in the technology industry. The company is headquartered in Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands.

Visit Website →

U.S. Bancorp

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - REGIONAL · USA

U.S. Bancorp is an American bank holding company based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and incorporated in Delaware. The company provides banking, investment, mortgage, trust, and payment services products to individuals, businesses, governmental entities, and other financial institutions.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?