WallStSmart

Omnicom Group Inc (OMC)vsRush Enterprises A Inc (RUSHA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Omnicom Group Inc generates 173% more annual revenue ($19.82B vs $7.27B). RUSHA leads profitability with a 3.6% profit margin vs 0.3%. RUSHA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.16. OMC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

OMC

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.0Value: 5.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.76

RUSHA

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.0Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.13
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

OMCUndervalued (+23.7%)

Margin of Safety

+23.7%

Fair Value

$90.88

Current Price

$77.06

$13.82 discount

UndervaluedFair: $90.88Overvalued
RUSHAUndervalued (+55.8%)

Margin of Safety

+55.8%

Fair Value

$164.81

Current Price

$72.31

$92.50 discount

UndervaluedFair: $164.81Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

OMC2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.2%10/10

Revenue surging 69.2% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

RUSHA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1310/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

OMC4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
2.0%3/10

ROE of 2.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.3%3/10

0.3% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
15.972/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

RUSHA4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

Operating margin of 4.9%

PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Revenue declined 9.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : OMC

The strongest argument for OMC centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 69.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : RUSHA

The strongest argument for RUSHA centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : OMC

The primary concerns for OMC are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 0.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : RUSHA

The primary concerns for RUSHA are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, PEG Ratio. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OMC profiles as a hypergrowth stock while RUSHA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

RUSHA carries more volatility with a beta of 0.93 — expect wider price swings.

OMC is growing revenue faster at 69.2% — sustainability is the question.

RUSHA generates stronger free cash flow (60M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

OMC scores higher overall (51/100 vs 47/100) and 69.2% revenue growth. RUSHA offers better value entry with a 55.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Omnicom Group Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Omnicom Group Inc. is an American global media, marketing and corporate communications holding company, headquartered in New York City.

Visit Website →

Rush Enterprises A Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?