WallStSmart

Ooma Inc (OOMA)vsPalo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 3644% more annual revenue ($11.48B vs $306.59M). OOMA leads profitability with a 3.6% profit margin vs 2.7%. PANW appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.73. OOMA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

OOMA

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.0Value: 5.3Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.83

PANW

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 9.3Profit: 4.5Value: 5.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 1/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

OOMAUndervalued (+31.8%)

Margin of Safety

+31.8%

Fair Value

$16.65

Current Price

$22.77

$6.12 discount

UndervaluedFair: $16.65Overvalued
PANWUndervalued (+34.1%)

Margin of Safety

+34.1%

Fair Value

$501.81

Current Price

$330.65

$171.16 discount

UndervaluedFair: $501.81Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

OOMA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
150.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 150.0% YoY

Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.4%8/10

Revenue surging 25.4% year-over-year

PANW4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$270.47B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Revenue GrowthGrowth
34.4%10/10

Revenue surging 34.4% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0910/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

OOMA4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.824/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Market CapQuality
$619.01M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.8%3/10

Operating margin of 4.8%

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.734/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
9.8x4/10

Trading at 9.8x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.7%3/10

2.7% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : OOMA

The strongest argument for OOMA centers on EPS Growth, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 25.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 34.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : OOMA

The primary concerns for OOMA are PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Profit Margin. A P/E of 56.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 295.2x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OOMA profiles as a growth stock while PANW is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

OOMA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.20 — expect wider price swings.

PANW is growing revenue faster at 34.4% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (788M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

OOMA scores higher overall (53/100 vs 51/100) and 25.4% revenue growth. PANW offers better value entry with a 34.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ooma Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Ooma, Inc. creates connected experiences for businesses and consumers in the United States, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?