WallStSmart

Oshkosh Corporation (OSK)vsWaste Management Inc (WM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Waste Management Inc generates 144% more annual revenue ($25.41B vs $10.42B). WM leads profitability with a 11.0% profit margin vs 6.2%. WM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.35. WM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

OSK

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.82

WM

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 3.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

OSKUndervalued (+32.8%)

Margin of Safety

+32.8%

Fair Value

$259.60

Current Price

$147.37

$112.23 discount

UndervaluedFair: $259.60Overvalued
WMSignificantly Overvalued (-80.0%)

Margin of Safety

-80.0%

Fair Value

$130.38

Current Price

$232.55

$102.17 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.38Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

OSK2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
14.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

WM2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$93.39B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
29.9%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

Areas to Watch

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.5%4/10

3.5% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.2%3/10

6.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

WM4 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.354/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
33.6x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
9.4x4/10

Trading at 9.4x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.5%4/10

3.5% revenue growth

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : WM

The strongest argument for WM centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : WM

The primary concerns for WM are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.39 — expect wider price swings.

WM is growing revenue faster at 3.5% — sustainability is the question.

WM generates stronger free cash flow (810M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

WM scores higher overall (58/100 vs 48/100). OSK offers better value entry with a 32.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Waste Management Inc

INDUSTRIALS · WASTE MANAGEMENT · USA

Waste Management, Inc. is an American waste management, comprehensive waste, and environmental services company in North America. Founded in 1968, the company is headquartered 800 Capitol in Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?