WallStSmart

Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)vsQ2 Holdings (QTWO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 1257% more annual revenue ($11.48B vs $846.20M). QTWO leads profitability with a 10.9% profit margin vs 2.7%. PANW appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.73. QTWO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C).

PANW

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 9.3Profit: 4.5Value: 5.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 1/9

QTWO

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 3.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.76
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PANWUndervalued (+34.1%)

Margin of Safety

+34.1%

Fair Value

$501.81

Current Price

$330.65

$171.16 discount

UndervaluedFair: $501.81Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for QTWO.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PANW4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$270.47B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Revenue GrowthGrowth
34.4%10/10

Revenue surging 34.4% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0910/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

QTWO2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
156.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 156.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0610/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.734/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
9.8x4/10

Trading at 9.8x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.7%3/10

2.7% margin — thin

QTWO3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
8.942/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
42.1x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.762/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 34.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : QTWO

The strongest argument for QTWO centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 12.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 295.2x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : QTWO

The primary concerns for QTWO are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score. A P/E of 42.1x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PANW profiles as a hypergrowth stock while QTWO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

QTWO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.33 — expect wider price swings.

PANW is growing revenue faster at 34.4% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (788M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QTWO scores higher overall (55/100 vs 51/100) and 12.6% revenue growth. PANW offers better value entry with a 34.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Q2 Holdings

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Q2 Holdings, Inc. provides cloud-based digital banking solutions to Community and Regional Financial Institutions (RCFIs) in the United States. The company is headquartered in Austin, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?