WallStSmart

Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)vsQ2 Holdings (QTWO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 1145% more annual revenue ($9.89B vs $794.81M). PANW leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs 6.5%. PANW appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.05. PANW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

PANW

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02

QTWO

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.0Value: 3.3Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.56
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PANWUndervalued (+60.8%)

Margin of Safety

+60.8%

Fair Value

$457.02

Current Price

$179.32

$277.70 discount

UndervaluedFair: $457.02Overvalued
QTWOUndervalued (+4.0%)

Margin of Safety

+4.0%

Fair Value

$58.97

Current Price

$52.51

$6.46 discount

UndervaluedFair: $58.97Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PANW3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$145.43B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

QTWO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
10802.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 10802.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
13.4x4/10

Trading at 13.4x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.052/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
100.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

QTWO4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
6.5%3/10

6.5% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
8.942/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
65.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.562/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 14.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : QTWO

The strongest argument for QTWO centers on EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 13.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 100.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : QTWO

The primary concerns for QTWO are Profit Margin, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 65.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

QTWO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.42 — expect wider price swings.

PANW is growing revenue faster at 14.9% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (470M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

PANW scores higher overall (56/100 vs 50/100) and 14.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Q2 Holdings

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Q2 Holdings, Inc. provides cloud-based digital banking solutions to Community and Regional Financial Institutions (RCFIs) in the United States. The company is headquartered in Austin, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?