WallStSmart

Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)vsQ2 Holdings (QTWO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 1191% more annual revenue ($10.61B vs $821.58M). QTWO leads profitability with a 9.0% profit margin vs 8.0%. PANW appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.79. QTWO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

PANW

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 9.3Profit: 3.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02

QTWO

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 3.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.76
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PANWUndervalued (+32.8%)

Margin of Safety

+32.8%

Fair Value

$467.52

Current Price

$314.15

$153.37 discount

UndervaluedFair: $467.52Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for QTWO.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PANW4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$273.25B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Revenue GrowthGrowth
31.1%10/10

Revenue surging 31.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

QTWO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
471.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 471.4% YoY

Areas to Watch

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
9.2x4/10

Trading at 9.2x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
8.0%3/10

8.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

QTWO3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
8.942/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
49.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.762/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 31.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : QTWO

The strongest argument for QTWO centers on EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 14.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Price/Book, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 294.1x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : QTWO

The primary concerns for QTWO are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score. A P/E of 49.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PANW profiles as a hypergrowth stock while QTWO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

QTWO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.33 — expect wider price swings.

PANW is growing revenue faster at 31.1% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (788M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QTWO scores higher overall (51/100 vs 47/100) and 14.1% revenue growth. PANW offers better value entry with a 32.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Q2 Holdings

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Q2 Holdings, Inc. provides cloud-based digital banking solutions to Community and Regional Financial Institutions (RCFIs) in the United States. The company is headquartered in Austin, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?