WallStSmart

Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)vsTelos Corp (TLS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 5903% more annual revenue ($9.89B vs $164.81M). PANW leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs -22.2%. PANW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

PANW

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.0Value: 2.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02

TLS

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.61
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PANWSignificantly Overvalued (-81.9%)

Margin of Safety

-81.9%

Fair Value

$84.24

Current Price

$153.22

$68.98 premium

UndervaluedFair: $84.24Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TLS.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PANW3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$128.28B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

TLS2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
77.4%10/10

Revenue surging 77.4% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0510/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
11.5x4/10

Trading at 11.5x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.962/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
87.3x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

TLS4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$326.56M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-32.8%2/10

ROE of -32.8% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.612/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 14.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TLS

The strongest argument for TLS centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 77.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 87.3x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : TLS

The primary concerns for TLS are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PANW profiles as a value stock while TLS is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TLS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.99 — expect wider price swings.

TLS is growing revenue faster at 77.4% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (470M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PANW scores higher overall (58/100 vs 38/100) and 14.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Telos Corp

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Telos Corporation provides global information technology (IT) solutions and services. The company is headquartered in Ashburn, Virginia.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?