WallStSmart

Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)vsEnergous Corporation (WATT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 175628% more annual revenue ($9.89B vs $5.63M). PANW leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs -170.4%. PANW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

PANW

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02

WATT

Avoid

21

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -154.64
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PANWUndervalued (+60.8%)

Margin of Safety

+60.8%

Fair Value

$457.02

Current Price

$179.32

$277.70 discount

UndervaluedFair: $457.02Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WATT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PANW3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$145.43B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

WATT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
610.0%10/10

Revenue surging 610.0% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.1010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
13.4x4/10

Trading at 13.4x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.052/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
100.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

WATT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$181.21M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-168.0%2/10

ROE of -168.0% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 14.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WATT

The strongest argument for WATT centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 610.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 100.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : WATT

The primary concerns for WATT are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PANW profiles as a value stock while WATT is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

PANW carries more volatility with a beta of 0.77 — expect wider price swings.

WATT is growing revenue faster at 610.0% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (470M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PANW scores higher overall (56/100 vs 21/100) and 14.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Energous Corporation

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Energous Corporation develops wireless charging solutions. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?