WallStSmart

Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)vsWrap Technologies Inc (WRAP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 211269% more annual revenue ($10.61B vs $5.02M). PANW leads profitability with a 8.0% profit margin vs -298.6%. PANW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 47/100 (D+).

PANW

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 9.3Profit: 3.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02

WRAP

Avoid

21

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -10.43
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PANWUndervalued (+40.6%)

Margin of Safety

+40.6%

Fair Value

$471.49

Current Price

$272.05

$199.44 discount

UndervaluedFair: $471.49Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WRAP.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PANW4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$231.90B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Revenue GrowthGrowth
31.1%10/10

Revenue surging 31.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

WRAP2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
45.2%10/10

Revenue surging 45.2% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
8.0%3/10

8.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.562/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

WRAP4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$73.02M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-103.8%2/10

ROE of -103.8% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 31.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WRAP

The strongest argument for WRAP centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 45.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 247.4x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : WRAP

The primary concerns for WRAP are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

WRAP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.41 — expect wider price swings.

WRAP is growing revenue faster at 45.2% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (788M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

PANW scores higher overall (47/100 vs 21/100) and 31.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Wrap Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS · USA

Wrap Technologies, Inc., a public safety technology and services company, develops policing solutions for law enforcement and security personnel. The company is headquartered in Tempe, Arizona.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?