WallStSmart

Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)vsUTime Limited (WTO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 4564% more annual revenue ($9.89B vs $212.12M). PANW leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs -251.5%. PANW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

PANW

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02

WTO

Avoid

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 3.0Value: 6.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -16.40
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PANWUndervalued (+39.7%)

Margin of Safety

+39.7%

Fair Value

$441.96

Current Price

$272.05

$169.91 discount

UndervaluedFair: $441.96Overvalued
WTOUndervalued (+44.6%)

Margin of Safety

+44.6%

Fair Value

$1.25

Current Price

$1.01

$0.24 discount

UndervaluedFair: $1.25Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PANW3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$241.01B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

WTO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.042/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
256.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

WTO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$1.68M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-347.8%2/10

ROE of -347.8% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on Market Cap, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 14.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WTO

The strongest argument for WTO centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 256.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : WTO

The primary concerns for WTO are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PANW profiles as a value stock while WTO is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

PANW carries more volatility with a beta of 0.77 — expect wider price swings.

PANW is growing revenue faster at 14.9% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (788M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PANW scores higher overall (57/100 vs 35/100) and 14.9% revenue growth. WTO offers better value entry with a 44.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

UTime Limited

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

UTime Limited, designs, develops, manufactures, sells, and operates mobile phones, accessories, and related consumer electronics. The company is headquartered in Shenzhen, China.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?