WallStSmart

TDH Holdings Inc (PETZ)vsYum! Brands Inc (YUM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Yum! Brands Inc generates 785177% more annual revenue ($8.21B vs $1.05M). YUM leads profitability with a 19.0% profit margin vs 2.6%. PETZ trades at a lower P/E of 7.1x. YUM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

PETZ

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 3.0Value: 8.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.86

YUM

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.0Value: 10.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PETZUndervalued (+32.1%)

Margin of Safety

+32.1%

Fair Value

$1.65

Current Price

$1.24

$0.41 discount

UndervaluedFair: $1.65Overvalued
YUMUndervalued (+38.8%)

Margin of Safety

+38.8%

Fair Value

$259.74

Current Price

$159.16

$100.58 discount

UndervaluedFair: $259.74Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PETZ3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.1x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.119/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

YUM2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
31.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 31.9%

EPS GrowthGrowth
27.7%8/10

Earnings expanding 27.7% YoY

Areas to Watch

PETZ4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.7%4/10

4.7% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
1.8%4/10

1.8% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$12.39M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.0%3/10

ROE of 6.0% — below average capital efficiency

YUM4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.964/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
28.7x4/10

Moderate valuation

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PETZ

The strongest argument for PETZ centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : YUM

The strongest argument for YUM centers on Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.0% and operating margin at 31.9%.

Bear Case : PETZ

The primary concerns for PETZ are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Thin 2.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : YUM

The primary concerns for YUM are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PETZ profiles as a value stock while YUM is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

PETZ carries more volatility with a beta of 1.54 — expect wider price swings.

YUM is growing revenue faster at 6.5% — sustainability is the question.

YUM generates stronger free cash flow (482M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

YUM scores higher overall (59/100 vs 44/100), backed by strong 19.0% margins. PETZ offers better value entry with a 32.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

TDH Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · China

TDH Holdings, Inc. develops, manufactures, and sells pet food products for pet owners in the People's Republic of China, Asia, Europe, and North America. The company is headquartered in Qingdao, the People's Republic of China.

Visit Website →

Yum! Brands Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Yum! Brands, Inc. is an American fast food corporation listed on the Fortune 1000. Yum! operates the brands KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, The Habit Burger Grill, and WingStreet worldwide, except in China, where the brands are operated by a separate company, Yum China.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?