WallStSmart

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)vsSFL Corporation Ltd (SFL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Parker-Hannifin Corporation generates 2743% more annual revenue ($20.46B vs $719.75M). PH leads profitability with a 17.3% profit margin vs -3.7%. PH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

PH

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 3.7Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.78

SFL

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PH.

SFLUndervalued (+59.9%)

Margin of Safety

+59.9%

Fair Value

$24.91

Current Price

$11.53

$13.38 discount

UndervaluedFair: $24.91Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PH3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$119.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
21.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.7%

SFL2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
25.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.5%

Areas to Watch

PH4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.6x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
8.0x4/10

Trading at 8.0x book value

PEG RatioValuation
3.912/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Earnings declined 9.0%

SFL4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$1.51B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-2.5%2/10

ROE of -2.5% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-24.3%2/10

Revenue declined 24.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-80.8%2/10

Earnings declined 80.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PH

The strongest argument for PH centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.3% and operating margin at 21.7%.

Bull Case : SFL

The strongest argument for SFL centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : PH

The primary concerns for PH are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : SFL

The primary concerns for SFL are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PH profiles as a mature stock while SFL is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

PH carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

PH is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

PH generates stronger free cash flow (768M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PH scores higher overall (54/100 vs 34/100), backed by strong 17.3% margins. SFL offers better value entry with a 59.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Parker-Hannifin Corporation, originally Parker Appliance Company, usually referred to as just Parker, is an American corporation specializing in motion and control technologies. Its corporate headquarters are in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, in Greater Cleveland.

SFL Corporation Ltd

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

SFL Corporation Ltd. is engaged in the ownership, operation and chartering of vessels and related assets offshore in medium and long-term charters. The company is headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?