WallStSmart

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)vsWaste Management Inc (WM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Waste Management Inc generates 24% more annual revenue ($25.41B vs $20.46B). PH leads profitability with a 17.3% profit margin vs 11.0%. WM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.35. WM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

PH

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 3.7Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.78

WM

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 3.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PH.

WMSignificantly Overvalued (-80.0%)

Margin of Safety

-80.0%

Fair Value

$130.38

Current Price

$232.55

$102.17 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.38Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PH3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$119.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
21.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.7%

WM2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$93.39B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
29.9%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

Areas to Watch

PH4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.6x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
8.0x4/10

Trading at 8.0x book value

PEG RatioValuation
3.912/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Earnings declined 9.0%

WM4 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.354/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
33.6x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
9.4x4/10

Trading at 9.4x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.5%4/10

3.5% revenue growth

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PH

The strongest argument for PH centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.3% and operating margin at 21.7%.

Bull Case : WM

The strongest argument for WM centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : PH

The primary concerns for PH are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : WM

The primary concerns for WM are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PH profiles as a mature stock while WM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

PH carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

PH is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

WM generates stronger free cash flow (810M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WM scores higher overall (58/100 vs 54/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Parker-Hannifin Corporation, originally Parker Appliance Company, usually referred to as just Parker, is an American corporation specializing in motion and control technologies. Its corporate headquarters are in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, in Greater Cleveland.

Waste Management Inc

INDUSTRIALS · WASTE MANAGEMENT · USA

Waste Management, Inc. is an American waste management, comprehensive waste, and environmental services company in North America. Founded in 1968, the company is headquartered 800 Capitol in Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?