WallStSmart

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)vsZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd (ZIM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Parker-Hannifin Corporation generates 196% more annual revenue ($20.46B vs $6.90B). PH leads profitability with a 17.3% profit margin vs 6.9%. ZIM trades at a lower P/E of 6.5x. PH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

PH

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 3.7Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.78

ZIM

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.5Value: 8.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PH.

ZIMUndervalued (+65.4%)

Margin of Safety

+65.4%

Fair Value

$61.02

Current Price

$26.01

$35.01 discount

UndervaluedFair: $61.02Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PH3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$119.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
21.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.7%

ZIM2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
6.5x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

PH4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.6x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
8.0x4/10

Trading at 8.0x book value

PEG RatioValuation
3.912/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Earnings declined 9.0%

ZIM4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
6.9%3/10

6.9% margin — thin

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-31.5%2/10

Revenue declined 31.5%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.2%2/10

Earnings declined 93.2%

Operating MarginProfitability
-2.0%1/10

Operating margin of -2.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PH

The strongest argument for PH centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.3% and operating margin at 21.7%.

Bull Case : ZIM

The strongest argument for ZIM centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : PH

The primary concerns for PH are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : ZIM

The primary concerns for ZIM are Profit Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PH profiles as a mature stock while ZIM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

ZIM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.46 — expect wider price swings.

PH is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

PH generates stronger free cash flow (768M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PH scores higher overall (54/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 17.3% margins. ZIM offers better value entry with a 65.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Parker-Hannifin Corporation, originally Parker Appliance Company, usually referred to as just Parker, is an American corporation specializing in motion and control technologies. Its corporate headquarters are in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, in Greater Cleveland.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., provides container shipping and related services in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Haifa, Israel.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?