WallStSmart

PVH Corp (PVH)vsVF Corporation (VFC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

VF Corporation generates 7% more annual revenue ($9.51B vs $8.92B). VFC leads profitability with a 2.9% profit margin vs -1.9%. PVH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.06. VFC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

PVH

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.10

VFC

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.5Value: 8.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.46
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PVH.

VFCUndervalued (+68.4%)

Margin of Safety

+68.4%

Fair Value

$65.94

Current Price

$13.52

$52.42 discount

UndervaluedFair: $65.94Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PVH2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.0610/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

VFC3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3210/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
78.1%10/10

Earnings expanding 78.1% YoY

Areas to Watch

PVH4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-96.2%2/10

Earnings declined 96.2%

VFC4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
2.9%3/10

2.9% margin — thin

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.2%2/10

Revenue declined 5.2%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-115.76M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.462/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PVH

The strongest argument for PVH centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.06 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : VFC

The strongest argument for VFC centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. PEG of 0.32 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : PVH

The primary concerns for PVH are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : VFC

The primary concerns for VFC are Profit Margin, Revenue Growth, Free Cash Flow. Debt-to-equity of 2.81 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 2.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PVH profiles as a turnaround stock while VFC is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

PVH carries more volatility with a beta of 1.72 — expect wider price swings.

PVH is growing revenue faster at -3.2% — sustainability is the question.

PVH generates stronger free cash flow (346M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

VFC scores higher overall (62/100 vs 50/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

PVH Corp

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL MANUFACTURING · USA

PVH Corp., formerly known as the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, is an American clothing company which owns brands such as Van Heusen, Tommy Hilfiger, Calvin Klein, IZOD, Arrow, Warner's, Olga, True & Co., and Geoffrey Beene.

VF Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL MANUFACTURING · USA

VF Corporation is an American worldwide apparel and footwear company founded in 1899 and headquartered in Denver, Colorado. The company's more than 30 brands are organized into three categories: Outdoor, Active and Work.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?