WallStSmart

Qnity Electronics, Inc (Q)vsVertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Vertiv Holdings Co generates 128% more annual revenue ($10.84B vs $4.75B). Q leads profitability with a 14.6% profit margin vs 14.4%. VRT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.66. VRT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

Q

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 3.3Quality: 5.0

VRT

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 8.0Value: 3.7Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.25
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

QOvervalued (-9.0%)

Margin of Safety

-9.0%

Fair Value

$105.09

Current Price

$143.59

$38.50 premium

UndervaluedFair: $105.09Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for VRT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

Q1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
20.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.4%

VRT4 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
45.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 45 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
30.1%10/10

Revenue surging 30.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
135.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 135.7% YoY

Market CapQuality
$130.60B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

Q4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
8.0%3/10

ROE of 8.0% — below average capital efficiency

PEG RatioValuation
2.862/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
43.5x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-52.8%2/10

Earnings declined 52.8%

VRT3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.664/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
85.4x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
35.7x2/10

Trading at 35.7x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : Q

The strongest argument for Q centers on Operating Margin.

Bull Case : VRT

The strongest argument for VRT centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 30.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : Q

The primary concerns for Q are Return on Equity, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 43.5x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : VRT

The primary concerns for VRT are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 85.4x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

Q profiles as a value stock while VRT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

VRT is growing revenue faster at 30.1% — sustainability is the question.

VRT generates stronger free cash flow (654M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

VRT scores higher overall (67/100 vs 49/100) and 30.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Qnity Electronics, Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS · USA

IQVIA Holdings Inc. provides integrated information and technology-enabled healthcare services in the Americas, Europe, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Durham, North Carolina.

Vertiv Holdings Co

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Vertiv Holdings Co designs, manufactures and services critical digital infrastructure technologies and lifecycle services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments in the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The company is headquartered in Columbus, Ohio.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?