WallStSmart

QMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (QMMM)vsT-Mobile US Inc (TMUS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

T-Mobile US Inc generates 4706450% more annual revenue ($88.31B vs $1.88M). TMUS leads profitability with a 12.4% profit margin vs -1.5%. TMUS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

QMMM

Avoid

14

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.39

TMUS

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.06
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for QMMM.

TMUSSignificantly Overvalued (-235.8%)

Margin of Safety

-235.8%

Fair Value

$66.10

Current Price

$211.36

$145.26 premium

UndervaluedFair: $66.10Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

QMMM2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0210/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

TMUS3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$236.30B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

PEG RatioValuation
0.808/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.18B8/10

Generating 4.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

QMMM4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Price/BookValuation
519.1x2/10

Trading at 519.1x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-2.0%2/10

ROE of -2.0% — below average capital efficiency

TMUS3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.993/10

Elevated debt levels

EPS GrowthGrowth
-26.6%2/10

Earnings declined 26.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.062/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : QMMM

The strongest argument for QMMM centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Bull Case : TMUS

The strongest argument for TMUS centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 11.3% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.80 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : QMMM

The primary concerns for QMMM are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : TMUS

The primary concerns for TMUS are Debt/Equity, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 1.99 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

QMMM profiles as a turnaround stock while TMUS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

TMUS is growing revenue faster at 11.3% — sustainability is the question.

TMUS generates stronger free cash flow (4.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ADVERTISING AGENCIES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

TMUS scores higher overall (60/100 vs 14/100) and 11.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

QMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

QMMM Holdings Limited, provides digital media advertising and marketing production services primarily in Hong Kong.

Visit Website →

T-Mobile US Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · TELECOM SERVICES · USA

T-Mobile US, Inc., doing business under the global brand name T-Mobile, is an American wireless network operator. Its headquarters are located in Bellevue, Washington, in the Seattle metropolitan area and Overland Park, Kansas, in the Kansas City metropolitan area.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?