WallStSmart

Scholastic Corporation (SCHL)vsJohn Wiley & Sons B (WLYB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

John Wiley & Sons B generates 5% more annual revenue ($1.67B vs $1.58B). WLYB leads profitability with a 11.9% profit margin vs 3.6%. SCHL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.85. WLYB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

SCHL

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.5Value: 6.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.50

WLYB

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

SCHLFair Value (+0.0%)

Margin of Safety

+0.0%

Fair Value

$35.30

Current Price

$35.01

$0.29 premium

UndervaluedFair: $35.30Overvalued
WLYBUndervalued (+61.0%)

Margin of Safety

+61.0%

Fair Value

$78.63

Current Price

$48.00

$30.63 discount

UndervaluedFair: $78.63Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SCHL2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

P/E RatioValuation
15.2x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

WLYB4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
108.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 108.4% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
20.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
13.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

SCHL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.854/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Market CapQuality
$672.64M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
7.5%3/10

ROE of 7.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

WLYB3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
13.402/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-2.6%2/10

Revenue declined 2.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-66.47M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SCHL

The strongest argument for SCHL centers on Price/Book, P/E Ratio.

Bull Case : WLYB

The strongest argument for WLYB centers on EPS Growth, Return on Equity, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : SCHL

The primary concerns for SCHL are PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Return on Equity. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WLYB

The primary concerns for WLYB are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SCHL profiles as a value stock while WLYB is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

SCHL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.01 — expect wider price swings.

WLYB is growing revenue faster at -2.6% — sustainability is the question.

SCHL generates stronger free cash flow (75M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WLYB scores higher overall (52/100 vs 51/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Scholastic Corporation

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · PUBLISHING · USA

Scholastic Corporation publishes and distributes children's books worldwide. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

John Wiley & Sons B

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · PUBLISHING · USA

John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (WLYB) is a leading global information services provider that specializes in scholarly publishing, professional development, and assessment services. The company is distinguished by its innovative use of technology to enhance educational access and engagement in an increasingly digital world. With a strong focus on sustainable growth and strategic value creation, Wiley is well-positioned to maintain its leadership in the education sector, making it a compelling investment for institutional investors looking to capitalize on opportunities in education and professional development.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?