WallStSmart

Smith-Midland Corp (SMID)vsSociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B (SQM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B generates 5641% more annual revenue ($5.30B vs $92.32M). SQM leads profitability with a 15.4% profit margin vs 11.4%. SQM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.34. SQM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).

SMID

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.5Value: 5.3Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 3.89

SQM

Strong Buy

74

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 7.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

SMIDSignificantly Overvalued (-54.7%)

Margin of Safety

-54.7%

Fair Value

$21.83

Current Price

$29.91

$8.08 premium

UndervaluedFair: $21.83Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SQM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SMID5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0810/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.8910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
26.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
15.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SQM4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3410/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
41.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 41.1%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.8%10/10

Revenue surging 69.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
165.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 165.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

SMID3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$157.68M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.0%2/10

Revenue declined 5.0%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-59.7%2/10

Earnings declined 59.7%

SQM1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SMID

The strongest argument for SMID centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. PEG of 1.20 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SQM

The strongest argument for SQM centers on PEG Ratio, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.4% and operating margin at 41.1%. Revenue growth of 69.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : SMID

The primary concerns for SMID are Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : SQM

The primary concerns for SQM are P/E Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SMID profiles as a declining stock while SQM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SMID carries more volatility with a beta of 1.70 — expect wider price swings.

SQM is growing revenue faster at 69.8% — sustainability is the question.

SQM generates stronger free cash flow (679M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SQM scores higher overall (74/100 vs 51/100), backed by strong 15.4% margins and 69.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Smith-Midland Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · BUILDING MATERIALS · USA

Smith-Midland Corporation invents, develops, manufactures, markets, leases, licenses, sells, and installs precast concrete products primarily for use in the construction, highway, utility, and agricultural industries. The company is headquartered in Midland, Virginia.

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Sociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals and other products and services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?